ActiveHashRelation

ActiveHashRelation is a complete substitute of ActiveRecord::Relation that allows you to run ActiveRecord queries using only regular Hash using a very powerful yet simple API. It was initially built to allow front-end teams to specify from the API exactly what they need withoug bugging the backend developers, eventually emerged into its own little gem.

Simple gem that allows you to manipulate ActiveRecord::Relation using JSON. For instance:

apply_filters(User.all, {name: 'filippos', created_at: {leq: "2016-10-19"}, role: 'regular', email: {like: 'vasilakis'}})

filter a resource based on it's associations using a NOT filter:

apply_filters(Microposts.all, {updated_at: { geq: "2014-11-2 14:25:04"}, user: {not: {email: vasilakisfil@gmail.com}})

or even filter a resource based on it's associations' associations using an OR filter:

apply_filters(Comments.all, {updated_at: { geq: "2014-11-2 14:25:04"}, user: {id: 9, units: {or: [{id: 22}, {id: 21}]} }})

and the list could go on.. Basically you can run anything ActiveRecord supports, except from groupping. It's perfect for filtering a collection of resources on APIs.

It should be noted that apply_filters calls ActiveHashRelation::FilterApplier class underneath with the same params.

You can also do aggregation queries, like sum, avg, min and max on any column.

*A user could retrieve resources based on unknown attributes (attributes not returned from the API) by brute forcing which might or might not be a security issue. If you don't like that check you can specify from the params exactly what is allowed and what is not allowed. For more information check: whitelisting.

Add this line to your application's Gemfile:

gem 'active_hash_relation', '~> 1.4.1'

And then execute:

$ bundle

Or install it yourself as:

$ gem install active_hash_relation

The gem exposes only one method: apply_filters(resource, hash_params, include_associations: true, model: nil). resource is expected to be an ActiveRecord::Relation. That way, you can add your custom filters before passing the Relation to ActiveHashRelation.

In order to use it you have to include ActiveHashRelation module in your class. For instance in a Rails API controller you would do:

class Api::V1::ResourceController < Api::V1::BaseController
  include ActiveHashRelation

  def index
    resources = apply_filters(Resource.all, params)

    authorized_resources = policy_scope(resource)

    render json: resources, each_serializer: Api::V1::ResourceSerializer
  end
end

If you need to enable filtering on scopes, you need to specify that explicitly from the initializer. Please run: bundle exec rails g active_hash_relation:initialize which will create an initializer with the following content:

ActiveHashRelation.configure do |config|
  #override default scope when accessing associations
  config.use_unscoped = true
  #set true to be able to filter scopes (with params)
  #please note that unfortunately (:/) rails does not provide any way
  #to iterate through scopes so it uses a monkey patch.
  #The monkey patch is as gentle as it can be by aliasing the method, adds some
  #sugar and calls it,
  #You need to run `initialize!` to actually include the required files
  config.filter_active_record_scopes = true
end

  #requires monkeyparched scopes, optional if you don't enable them
  ActiveHashRelation.initialize!

If you are not using Rails, just add the code above in your equivelant initialize block.

For each param, apply_filters method will search in the model's (derived from the first param, or explicitly defined as the last param) all the record's column names and associations. (filtering based on scopes are not working at the moment but will be supported soon). For each column, if there is such a param, it will apply the filter based on the column type. The following column types are supported:

You can apply an equality filter:

• {example_column: 500}

or using an array (ActiveRecord translates that internally to an IN query)

• {example_column: [500, 40]}

or using a hash as a value you get more options:

• {example_column: {le: 500}}
• {example_column: {leq: 500}}
• {example_column: {ge: 500}}
• {example_column: {geq: 500}}

Of course you can provide a compination of those like:

• {example_column: {geq: 500, le: 1000}}

The same api is for a Float, Decimal, Date, Time or Datetime/Timestamp.

The boolean value is converted from string using ActiveRecord's TRUE_VALUES through value_to_boolean method.. So for a value to be true must be one of the following: [true, 1, '1', 't', 'T', 'true', 'TRUE']. Anything else is false.

• {example_column: true}
• {example_column: 0}

You can apply an incensitive matching filter (currently working only for Postgres):

• {example_column: 'test'} #runs EXAMPLE_COLUMN = 'test'
• {example_column: ['test', 'another test']} #runs EXAMPLE_COLUMN = 'test' OR EXAMPLE_COLUMN = 'another test'

or using a hash as a value you get more options:

• {example_column: {eq: 'exact value'}} #runs: EXAMPLE_COLUMN = 'test'
• {example_column: {starts_with: 'exac'}} #runs: EXAMPLE_COLUMN LIKE 'test%'
• {example_column: {ends_with: 'alue'}} #runs: EXAMPLE_COLUMN LIKE '%test'
• {example_column: {like: 'ct_va'}} #runs: EXAMPLE_COLUMN LIKE '%test%'

If you want to filter using ILIKE you can pass an with_ilike param:

• {example_column: {like: 'ct_va', with_ilike: true}} #runs: EXAMPLE_COLUMN ILIKE '%test%'
• {example_column: {like: 'ct_va', with_ilike: true}} #runs: EXAMPLE_COLUMN ILIKE '%test%'

Please note that ILIKE and especially LIKE are quite slow if you have millions of records in the db even with an index.

A limit param defines the number of returned resources. For instance:

• {limit: 10}

However I would strongly advice you to use a pagination gem like Kaminari, and use page and per_page params.

You can apply sorting using the property as the key of the hash and order as the value. For instance:

• {sort: {created_at: desc}}

You can also order by multiple attributes:

• {sort: {created_at: desc, microposts_count: :asc}}

If there is no column named after the property value, sorting is skipped.

You can apply sorting using the property and order attributes. For instance:

• {sort: {property: :created_at, order: :desc}}

You can also order by multiple attributes:

• {sort: [{property: :created_at, order: :desc}, {property: :created_at, order: :desc}]}

If there is no column named after the property value, sorting is skipped.

If the association is a belongs_to or has_one, then the hash key name must be in singular. If the association is has_many the attribute must be in plural reflecting the association type. When you have, in your hash, filters for an association, the sub-hash is passed in the association's model. For instance, let's say a user has many microposts and the following filter is applied (could be through an HTTP GET request on controller's index method):

• {email: test@user.com, microposts: {created_at { leq: 12-9-2014} }

Internally, ActiveHashRelation, extracts {created_at { leq: 12-9-2014} } and runs it on Micropost model. So the final query will look like:

micropost_filter = Micropost.all.where("CREATED_AT =< ?", '12-9-2014'.to_datetime)
User.where(email: 'test@user.com').joins(:microposts).merge(micropost_filter)

You can apply null filter for generate query like this "users.name IS NULL" or "users.name IS NOT NULL" with this following code: { name: { null: true } } for is null filter and { name: { null: false } } for not null filter.

this can be used also for relations tables, so you can write like this { books: {title: {null: false }} }

You can apply an SQL OR (for ActiveRecord 5+) using the following syntax: {or: [{name: 'Filippos'}, {name: 'Vasilis'}]}

It will generate: WHERE ((users.name = 'Filippos') OR (users.name = 'Vasilis'))

You can apply an OR on associations as well or even nested ones, there isn't much limitation on that. I suggest you though to take a look on the tests, cause the syntax gets a bit complex after a while ;)

You can apply an SQL NOT (for ActiveRecord 4+) using the following syntax: {not: {name: 'Filippos', email: {ends_with: '@gmail.com'}}}

It will generate: WHERE (NOT (users.name = 'Filippos')) AND (NOT (users.email LIKE '%@gmail.com'))

You can apply an NOT on associations as well or even nested ones, there isn't much limitation on that. I suggest you to also take a look on the tests.

Also I should note that you need to add specific (partial) queries if you don't want to have performance issues on tables with millions of rows.

Filtering on scopes is not enabled by default. You need to add the initializer mentioned in the beginning of the How to use section..

Scopes are supported via a tiny monkeypatch in the ActiveRecord's scope class method which holds the name of each scope. The monkey patch is as gentle as it can be: it aliases the method, adds some sugar and executes it.

Scopes with arguments are also supported but not tested much. Probably they will work fine unless your arguments expect complex objects.

If you want to filter based on a scope in a model, the scope names should go under scopes sub-hash. For instance the following:

• { scopes: { planned: true } }

will run the .planned scope on the resource.

• {scopes: {created_between: [1988, 2018]}}

will run the .created_on(1988, 2018) scope on the resource.

If you have a default scope in your models and you have a good reason to keep that, active_hash_relation provides an option to override it when filtering associations:

#config/initializers/active_hash_relation.rb
ActiveHashRelation.configure do |config|
  config.use_unscoped = true
end

You still have to provide the main model active_hash_relation runs as unscoped though.

apply_filters(Video.unscoped.all, {limit: 30, user: {country_code: 'SE'}})
#"SELECT  \"videos\".* FROM \"videos\" INNER JOIN \"users\" ON \"users\".\"id\" = \"videos\".\"user_id\" WHERE (users.country_code ILIKE '%GR%') LIMIT 30"

If you don't want to allow a column/association/scope just remove it from the params hash.

Sometimes, especially on larger projects, you have specific classes that handle the input params outside the controllers. You can configure the gem to look for those classes and call apply_filters which will apply the necessary filters when iterating over associations.

In an initializer:

#config/initializers/active_hash_relation.rb
ActiveHashRelation.configure do |config|
  config.has_filter_classes = true
  config.filter_class_prefix = 'Api::V1::'
  config.filter_class_suffix = 'Filter'
end

With the above settings, when the association name is resource, Api::V1::ResourceFilter.new(resource, params[resource]).apply_filters will be called to apply the filters in resource association.

Sometimes we need to ask the database queries that act on the collection but don't want back an array of elements but a value instead! Now you can do that on an ActiveRecord::Relation by simply calling the aggregations method inside the controller:

aggregations(resource, {
  aggregate: {
    integer_column: { avg: true, max: true, min: true, sum: true },
    float_column: {avg: true, max: true, min: true },
    datetime_column: { max: true, min: true }
  }
})

and you will get a hash (HashWithIndifferentAccess) back that holds all your aggregations like:

{"float_column"=>{"avg"=>25.5, "max"=>50, "min"=>1},
 "integer_column"=>{"avg"=>4.38, "sum"=>219, "max"=>9, "min"=>0},
 "datetime_at"=>{"max"=>2015-06-11 20:59:14 UTC, "min"=>2015-06-11 20:59:12 UTC}}

These attributes usually go to the "meta" section of your serializer. In that way it's easy to parse them in the front-end (for ember check here). Please note that you should apply the aggregations after you apply the filters (if there any) but before you apply pagination!

1. Fork it ( https://github.com/oddcamp/active_hash_relation/fork )
2. Create your feature branch (git checkout -b my-new-feature)
3. Commit your changes (git commit -am 'Add some feature')
4. Push to the branch (git push origin my-new-feature)
5. Create a new Pull Request