0.0
No commit activity in last 3 years
No release in over 3 years
A small library to coerce and validate API responses using PORO's.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
 Dependencies

Development

~> 1.3
>= 0
>= 0
>= 0

Runtime

 Project Readme

FirstResponder

A small library to coerce and validate API responses using PORO's.

Installation

Add this line to your application's Gemfile:

gem 'first_responder'

And then execute:

$ bundle

Or install it yourself as:

$ gem install first_responder

Usage

FirstResponder includes the veritable virtus and ActiveModel::Validations libraries within classes to add attributes and validations to API response objects.

This allows validation of API reponses at a "model" level, be they responses from real-world production services or Mock API's.

Classes that include FirstResponder can be instantiated with either XML or JSON and can define the required attributes for that model.

Examples

To use FirstResponder, simply include it in your class. Then specify your required attributes, as in this fictitious example:

class TwitterResponse
  include FirstResponder
  requires :tweet, String
  requires :date, DateTime
end

Then instantiate the class:

response = TwitterResponse.new(:json, '{"tweet": "This is a tweet."}')

response.valid?
=> false

response.date = "June 22nd, 2013"
response.valid?
=> true

As long as the response contains the required attributes, the instance will be considered valid.

FirstResponder also supports attributes referencing an Array of objects, allowing Virtus to coerce those objects:

class Foo
  include Virtus
  attribute :foo, String
end

class Biz
  include FirstResponder
  requires :foos, Array[Foo], at: ""
end

We can pass an array of objects -- even at the root level in the case of JSON -- and our Biz class will have its collection of Foos:

json_array = '[ {"foo": "bar" }, { "foo": "bar"} ]'
biz = Biz.new(:json, json_array)

biz.foos
=> [#<Foo:0x007f876ac14be0 @foo="bar">, #<Foo:0x007f876ac1e938 @foo="bar">]

Nested Keys

FirstResponder assumes that the attribute you're defining is an unnested hash key. The following example shows how to enable nested hash keys:

class Magician
  include FirstResponder
  requires :surprise, String, at: "[:black][:hat]" # or using strings "['black']['hat']" 
end

Then instantiate with JSON/XML as before:

trick = '{"black": {"hat": "RABBIT!"}}'
magician = Magician.new(:json, trick)

And, as one might have seen coming:

magician.surprise
=> "RABBIT!"

Were the black hat empty, the magician would, of course, not be valid ;) The previous example also highlights a second hidden feature in the at parameter: aliasing. If you want to refer to a JSON/XML node by a different name, simply require the attribute as you wish it to be called, pointing to its hash location.

The Root

But what if all of your desired information is nested deeply within XML/JSON, always under the same outer node? Because we're all lazy and efficient, FirstResponder offers the ability to define a root element, which serves as the jumping off point for all other attributes using at:

class Treasure
  include Virtus
  attribute :type, String
  attribute :weight, Integer
  attribute :unit, String
end

class TreasureHunt
  include FirstResponder
  root "[:ocean][:sea_floor][:treasure_chest][:hidden_compartment]"
  requires :treasure, Treasure
end

So when we get back our sunken treasure response, and it contains multiple attributes we don't really care about, the code above allows us to skip straight to the good stuff!

response = '{"ocean": 
              { "sea_floor": 
                {"treasure_chest": 
                  {"hidden_compartment": 
                    { "treasure": { "type": "Gold", "weight": 1, "unit": "Ton" }}}}}}'

treasure_hunt = TreasureHunt.new(:json, response)
treasure_hunt.treasure
=> #<Treasure:0x007fe50c98c990 @type="Gold", @weight=1, @unit="Ton">

Treasure that.

Nested Validations

FirstResponder will also detect problems lurking beneath the surface by automatically searching for and validating nested attributes. Take the previous example of a TreasureHunt and Treasure classes, this time including FirstResponder and requiring the presence of certain attributes. A TreasureHunt, after all, is only valid if the Treasure it finds is:

class TreasureHunt
  include FirstResponder
  root "[:ocean][:sea_floor][:treasure_chest][:hidden_compartment]"
  requires :treasure, Treasure
end

class Treasure
  include FirstResponder
  requires :type, String
  requires :weight, Integer
  requires :unit, String
end

We instantiate our TreasureHunt this time, however, with what appears to be a Treasure, but isn't:

response = '{"ocean": 
              { "sea_floor": 
                {"treasure_chest": 
                  {"hidden_compartment": 
                    { "treasure": { "type": null, "weight": null, "unit": null}}}}}}'

treasure_hunt = TreasureHunt.new(:json, response)
treasure_hunt.treasure

Coercion still works, but the Treasure object that's been created is devoid of all value. It is itself, of course, invalid:

treasure_hunt.treasure.valid?
=> false

But since FirstResponder knows that our TreasureHunt requires a Treasure, our TreasureHunt is also rendered invalid:

treasure_hunt.valid?
=> false

The Invalid Callback

FirstResponder also allows an object to execute arbitrary code when the object isn't valid. It is defined on the class and triggered when #invalid? is true or #valid? is false:

class InvalidWithCallback
  include FirstResponder
  requires :important_attr, String
  requires :another, String
  when_invalid { |data, errors| puts data }
end

with_callback = InvalidWithCallback.new(:json, '{"foo":"bar"}')
with_callback.valid?
{"foo"=>"bar"}
=> false

As you can tell from the example above, the code will be executed by default whenever valid? is called before the boolean value is returned. Should you desire a return value without executing the callback in a specific intsance, you can supply false to the valid? and invalid? methods:

with_callback.valid?(false)
=> false

with_callback.invalid?(false)
=> true

ActiveModel::Validations

Because FirstResponder uses ActiveModel::Validations under the covers, you can use most of the API you already know to validate individual attributes. Of course, this excludes those checks relying on persistence (i.e. uniqueness) or attempts to validate an object using Virtus coercion.

class Baz
  include FirstResponder
  requires :foo, String, format: { with: /bar/ }
end

This should play nicely with the options one normally passes to Virtus attributes, but be advised that collisions are theoretically possible. Should you run into an issue here, please don't hesitate to open up an issue.

For further validation examples, please see the Rails Guides or ActiveModel::Validations API docs.

TODO

  1. Pinpoint errors in JSON/XML in exception (helps to debug API problems)
  2. Raise when attribute not present in data on instantiation.
  3. Clearly separate ActiveModel::Validation options from those passed to Virtus

Contributing

  1. Fork it
  2. Create your feature branch (git checkout -b my-new-feature)
  3. Commit your changes (git commit -am 'Add some feature')
  4. Push to the branch (git push origin my-new-feature)
  5. Create new Pull Request