Project

gift_wrap

0.0
No commit activity in last 3 years
No release in over 3 years
A simple Ruby presenter library, for those who enjoy a strong separation of concerns. You include a module, call some class-level macro-style methods, and suddenly you're presenting for a wrapped object. No magic. If your knowledge of pattern names comes from the Rails ecosystem, you might have used the popular Draper 'decorator' library. Think of this like that one, except the term 'presenter' is a better fit.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
 Dependencies

Development

>= 4.0.0, ~> 4.0
~> 1.7
~> 10.0
>= 1.3.0, ~> 1.3
>= 1.1.0, ~> 1.1
 Project Readme

GiftWrap

A simple Ruby presenter library, for those who enjoy a strong separation of concerns.

What does that mean?

A presenter is just a decorator that is specifically concerned with the presentation layer. GiftWrap provides a simple way to "wrap" a domain entity (e.g. model) for the purpose of decorating it with said presentational logic.

That sort of "view logic" almost never belongs deep in the core code of your domain entities. Yet somehow throwing together classes to house it elsewhere can feel like a chore comprised mostly of boilerplate.

GiftWrap removes this feeling while also being lightweight enough that reading the entire source takes only a few minutes. The core module weighs in at about 70 lines of code and no dependencies. Even the optional helpers for those who use ActiveRecord weigh in at only an additional 30 lines of code, give or take.

Even better, any model logic which is not relevant to presentation or view code is not accidentally accessible on a class implementing GiftWrap::Presenter (e.g. persistence code doesn't leak through to templates).

Other Options

Competition benefits the consumer, and in this case that's you! There is another great gem that does this named Draper, which used to it call itself a "decorator" library, but now focuses on being a tool for "view models". Don't let this indecision in terminology distract from the incredible amount of features and flexibility the project has developed over the last several years.

Another project, Rectify, has a presenter library included in it the same goal as GiftWrap. Rectify's presenters take a more Rails-specific approach, and joins this author in criticizing Rails' use of the term "view" for what are just templates.

In both libraries' cases (barring abuse of certain Draper features), separating a domain entity's multi-faceted presentational needs from any internal or persistence logic is achieved just as as well as by GiftWrap. These libraries are equally useful contenders to consider if you like the extras they provide: a large feature set for Draper, additional abstractions in the case of Rectify.

Overview of Use

  1. gem install 'gift_wrap'
  2. include GiftWrap::Presenter in a PORO, a Plain Old Ruby Object.
  3. Call wrapped_as with some entity/model name.
  4. Write your own presentational methods in a safe, isolated place.

Optionally, you can delegate methods directly with unwrap_for if desired, or use wrap_association to keep your presenters referencing each other, instead of letting them meddle in associated core domain models.

What You Get

  • A place to isolate all presentational logic related to a particular domain concept or model.
  • An attributes method for capturing a user-defined set methods as a Hash.
  • Easy delegation to the underlying model with unwrap_for. Use sparingly and with great dicipline.
  • Short-hand to declare unwrapped methods as attributes, via attribute: true in the call to unwrap_for.
  • The ability to include any methods you define in the usual manner (i.e. def make_some_noise) as an attribute.
  • Optional JSON serialization via ActiveModel::Serializers::JSON, derived attributes.
  • A way to declare an unwrapped method as an "associations" which should be wrapped in their own presenter class.
  • Array-valued associations are built as an array of the association's presenter class.

You might even have one model with two distinct presenters that display the model's attributes in a different manner which are particular to their use in your system's presentation layer.

Simple Use

Consider a model class representing a map. A Map is of a certain type (physical, political, traffic, etc.), has a defined center point, associated units, a legend and possibly some notes. Some maps show roads, while others do not.

Here is such a class:

class Map
  attr_reader :type, :center, :units, :legend
  attr_accessor :notes

  def initialize(type, center, units, legend = :asshole_mapmaker_forgot_legend)
    @type   = type
    @center = center
    @units  = units
    @notes  = ""
    @legend = legend
  end

  def shows_roads?
    maps_with_roads.include?(type)
  end

private

  def maps_with_roads
    ['road', 'traffic', 'political']
  end
end

Now consider a minimal presenter which delegates the type and units methods, and adds a few presentation-specific methods:

class SimpleMapPresenter
  include GiftWrap::Presenter

  unwrap_for :type
  unwrap_for :units, attribute: true

  attribute :metric

  def metric
    metric_map_units.include?(units)
  end

  def contains_region?(region_name)
    false # Implementation not important
  end

  private

  def metric_map_units
    ['m', 'km']
  end
end

The methods type and units are delegated via unwrap_for, with units being declared as an attribute.

The additional presentational methods are contains_region? and metric, with metric being declared as an attribute.

Thus a call to SimpleMapPresenter#attributes would return a Hash with the keys :units and :metric, and because they are not explicitly delegated or otherwise referenced, the methods center, legend and shows_roads? on a Map object are not accessible on the presenter object.

Explicit Reference of Wrapped Object

In case you would like to internally access the object which your presenter wraps by a domain-appropriate name, the method wrapped_as allows for this.

If in the above Map class we used this, we could refer to the map by name within instance methods of the presenter. For example, exposing a has_notes? method without allowing access to the notes method on the map itself:

class SimpleMapPresenter
  include GiftWrap::Presenter

  wrapped_as :map

  # Previous implementation goes here

  def has_notes?
    map.notes && map.notes.length > 0
  end
end

Or better yet, when providing a default message for missing values, you can keep clunky-looking conditional code such as

<% if map.notes.length > 0 %>
  <%= map.notes %>
<% else %>
  (No notes provided)
<% end  %>

out of your templates entirely! Behold:

class SimpleMapPresenter
  include GiftWrap::Presenter

  wrapped_as :map

  # Previous implementation goes here

  def has_notes?
    map.notes && map.notes.length > 0
  end

  def notes
    has_notes? ? map.notes : "(No notes provided)"
  end
end

Then your view template simply becomes

<%= map_presenter.notes %>

Associated Objects with their own Presenters

Looking at our simple Map class, we've ignored its legend attribute entirely. This is likely expressed as an object with behavior of its own:

class Legend
  def initialize(colored_regions, colored_lines)
    @colored_regions  = colored_regions
    @colored_lines    = colored_lines
  end

  def region_meaning(color)
    @colored_regions[color]
  end

  def line_meaning(color)
    @colored_lines[color]
  end
end

The Legend class can be given two hashes which define some of its colors. So for instance, a traffic map might have a legend which is passed colors for land and water regions, and then any colored lines represent traffic congestion:

traffic_map_legend = Legend.new(
  { beige:  "land",
    blue:   "water"
  },
  { green:  "no congestion",
    yellow: "light congestion",
    red:    "heavy congestion",
    black:  "impassable"
  })

And accordingly would have its own presenter when it is used in any presentation or view layer of a project:

class LegendPresenter
  include GiftWrap::Presenter

  unwrap_for :line_meaning

  attribute :red_lines

  def red_lines
    line_meaning(:red)
  end

  def yellow_lines
    line_meaning(:yellow)
  end

  def green_lines
    line_meaning(:green)
  end

And an example of its use:

traffic_legend_presenter = LegendPresenter.new(traffic_map_legend)
traffic_legend_presenter.red_lines
# => "heavy congestion"
traffic_legend_presenter.yellow_lines
# => "light congestion"
traffic_legend_presenter.green_lines
# => "no congestion"
traffic_legend_presenter.black_lines
# => NoMethodError: undefined method `black_lines'

A presenter which wraps a Map object and which wishes to expose its Legend object would do well to instead expose an instance of LegendPresenter. It is preferable to keep adjacent code working at the same level of abstraction where possible.

Slavishly re-implementing a method with def legend only to return an instance of LegendPresenter seems a bit boilerplate, so GiftWrap has a convenience for this:

class LegendaryMapPresenter
  include GiftWrap::Presenter

  unwrap_for :type, :units

  wrap_association :legend, with: LegendPresenter

  def metric?
    metric_map_units.include?(units)
  end

  private

  def metric_map_units
    ['m', 'km']
  end
end

Unlike the SimpleMapPresenter, this version has a legend method which performs this wrapping for us by calling wrap_association and passing the class LegendPresenter in the :with keyword.

Customizing Associated Presenters

If the name legend was for some reason not desirable, there is no need for the method name exposed on the presenter to be the same of that on the wrapped object. Specifying the association's method name is just another keyword argument in the call to wrap_association. If the above class instead had

wrap_association :legend, with: LegendPresenter, as: :roflcopter

Then the associated Legend, wrapped in a LegendPresenter, would be accessible via map_presenter.roflcopter instead of map_presenter.legend.

Association Presenters can also be specified on a per-instance basis, for flexible modification of presentational logic. So if we were malicious map makers and gave a traffic map legend for which every line color meant "no congestion", we could write such a class:

class MisleadingLegendPresenter
  include GiftWrap::Presenter

  unwrap_for :line_meaning

  def red_lines
    "no congestion"
  end

  def yellow_lines
    "no congestion"
  end

  def green_lines
    "no congestion"
  end
end

And build our presenter for the traffic map as before, but override the presenter for the legend association. This is accomplished by an :associations keyword that simply maps the association name to the presenter which should be used. So given a traffic map stored in a variable named map_with_legend which references our previous traffic_map_legend as its legend:

map_presenter = LegendaryMapPresenter.new(map_with_legend, associations: {
  legend: MisleadingLegendPresenter
})
traffic_legend_presenter = map_presenter.legend

The instance-specific presenter will take effect and traffic_legend_presenter will act quite differently than before:

traffic_legend_presenter.red_lines
# => "no congestion"
traffic_legend_presenter.yellow_lines
# => "no congestion"
traffic_legend_presenter.green_lines
# => "no congestion"

JSON Serialization

Although the activemodel gem is not a depedency of GiftWrap, if it is included in a project, then by default GiftWrap::Presenter will also include ActiveModel::Serializers::JSON for use of its to_json and as_json methods.

This can be explicitly controlled via the GiftWrap's one and only configuration option. In some code that is executed at load-time, do the following:

GiftWrap.configure do |config|
  config.use_serializers = false # or true if desired
end

A known issue/limitation: The serializer module also comes with a from_json method, but (depending on activemodel version) this relies on being able to write directly to an attributes hash via an attributes= method, or on having writer methods for every attribute. This is somewhat contrary to the way in which attributes can come from any presentation logic computed by a method which is declared with the attribute class macro. While this discrepancy is undesirable, the only solution might be to remove the from_json method after inclusion.

ActiveRecord Convenience Module

GiftWrap does not depend on, or require ActiveRecord. But for those who are using GiftWrap as presentational wrappers for ActiveRecord models, an convenience module is provided: GiftWrap::ActiveRecordPresenter. It includes the standard GiftWrap::Presenter but provides an additional convenience method: unwrap_columns_for which will set up an attribute for every column detected on a given ActiveRecord subclass at load time.

Assuming a User class inheriting from ActiveRecord::Base with a first_name, last_name, email and password column in the backing database's table, then:

class UserPresenter
  unwrap_columns_for User
end

Will call unwrap_for on all four of those columns, and also declare them as attributes. Similar to individual calls to unwrap_for, passing an :attribute keyword parameter allows explicitly setting this to true, or to not set any columns as attributes by passing attribute: false.

However, automatically setting all columns to true will cause methods such as to_json and attributes to include some data that might be undesirable to expose in a view layer. Like a password column for instance. Consequently, the :attribute keyword argument can also accept a hash with the key of :only or :except, which map to the column names which should be included or excluded from being attributes, respectively.

For example, to avoid making our above User's password an attribute:

class UserPresenter
  unwrap_columns_for User, attribute: { except: [:password] }
end