Low commit activity in last 3 years
No release in over a year
Extends the interactor gem
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
 Dependencies

Development

>= 0

Runtime

 Project Readme

Interactor::Strict

A stricter version of Interactor.

Gem Version Build Status Maintainability Test Coverage Ruby Style Guide

Getting Started

Add interactor-strict to your Gemfile and bundle install.

gem "interactor-strict"

How to use

Include the Interactor module as well as the Intractor::Strict. That will allow you to use keyword arguments. The of keyword arguments is that you may not miss them, as they will be required by the interpreter. Also, you'll not need to document your params in comments, because the method signature will do that for you.

class SomeService
  include Interactor::Strict # that will allow you to use keywords

  # you should now use keyword arguments
  def call(foo:, bar:, other_arg: 'default')
    context.result = [foo, bar, other_arg]
  end
end

SomeService.call(foo: "the-foo", bar: "the-bar")

Without the strict interactor module, you would have implemented that service more or less like:

class SomeService
  include Interactor

  def call
    raise "missing foo" if context.foo.nil?
    raise "missing bar" if context.bar.nil?
    context.result = [context.foo, context.bar, context.with_default || "default"]
  end
end

SomeService.call(foo: "the-foo", bar: "the-bar")

Credits

This code started as a fork of mjacobus/interactor.

Disclaimer/Opinion

The Interactor gem provides a DSL for a very common design of service classes in ruby.

I don't particularly support this type of service. I don't like its design because this is not really OOP. Service.call is a function attached to a namespace.

Also, it imposes on your API/Interface, providing a DSL that brings no real value. You should decide how your services should be designed.

However, if you do think Interactor provides a good pattern - or you happen to work in a project that uses this heavily - you are better off with this stricter extension.