UnificationAssertion
UnificationAssertion provides powerful and simple way to compare two structures which may be different partially. The comparison is based on unification algorithm, which is used in Prolog implementations and type inference algorithms.
The assertion will be like the following:
assert_unifiable({ "timestamp" => :_,
"person" => {
"id" => :_,
"name" => "John",
"email" => "john@example.com",
"created_at" => :_a,
"updated_at" => :_a
}
}, JSON.parse(@response.body))
It compares two hash objects, but it does not care the exact value of
"timestamp"
, "id"
, "created_at"
, and "updated_at"
. The meta
variable :_a
is not a black hole but test the equality between
"created_at"
and "updated_at"
.
Introduction
I have been writing some tests like the following Rails functional tests.
# Testing a web api which create a person data and send the created person object as JSON
post(:create_person, { :person => { :name => "John", :email => "john@example.com" } })
# Compare expected hash and actual result parsed by JSON parser
assert_equal({ "timestamp" => Time.now,
"person" => {
"id" => 13,
"name" => "John",
"email" => "john@example.com",
"created_at" => Time.now,
"updated_at" => Time.now
}
}, JSON.parse(@response.body))
You may point out some problems on the test.
- The ID of the result may be different from 13
- It is not sure to assume
result["timestamp"]
is equal toTime.now
- It is not sure to assume
result["person"]["created_at"]
is equal toTime.now
The root of the problems is that the comparison is too strict. The
properties I would like to test is only its name
and email
fields. So I should test like the following:
assert_equal "John", result["person"]["name"]
assert_equal "john@example.com", result["person"]["email"]
It looks too complicated, and we need some way to compare structures.
This library, UnificationAssertion, provides the primitive for the
comparison called assert_unifiable
.
assert_unifiable({ "timestamp" => :_,
"person" => {
"id" => :_,
"name" => "John",
"email" => "john@example.com",
"created_at" => :_a,
"updated_at" => :_a
}
}, JSON.parse(@response.body))
Symbols :_a
for example, where its name starts with _
is
interpreted as a meta variable. assert_unifiable
does not care their
exact value is, but only the existence (can be nil
) and equalities
for each occurance will be tested. The special symbol :_
is a
wildcard. It can appear many times, but it will not be bound with any
value.
Examples
assert_unifiable(:_a, 1) # pass, :_a will be 1
assert_unifiable([:_a, 1], [1, 1]) # pass, :_a will be 1
assert_unifiable([:_, :_], [1, 2]) # pass, :_ can not be bound with any value
assert_unifiable([:_a, :_a], [1, 2]) # fail, :_a can not be either 1 and 2
assert_unifiable([:_a], [1,2,3]) # fail, :_a can be a value but can not be a sequence
assert_unifiable({ :x => :_a }, { :x => 1 }) # pass, :_a will be 1
assert_unifiable({ :y => :_a }, { }) # fail, a key :y should be present
assert_unifiable({ :y => :_a }, { :y => nil }) # pass, :_a will be nil
assert_unifiable({ :_a => 1 }, { :x => 1 }) # fail, meta variable can not appear as a key
# assert_unifiable can receive a block, which will be yielded with the result of unification.
assert_unifiable([:_a, :_b], [1, 2]) do |unifier|
assert unifier[:_a] < unifier[:_b]
end
Installation
Update your Gemfile
.
gem "unification_assertion", :git => "git://github.com/soutaro/unification_assertion.git"
Write your test case.
require "minitest/autorun"
require "unification_assertion"
class GreatTest < MiniTest::Unit::TestCase
include UnificationAssertion
def test_something
assert_unifiable([:_a, :_b], [1, 2])
end
end
Known Issues
It skips occur check
The recursive pattern can not be processed well.
assert_unifiable(:_a, { :x => :_a })
Usual unification algorithm rejects such input by occur check. This library is expected to be used for testing, so that I omit the checking. (Who in the world will write such comparison?)
Author
Written by Soutaro Matsumoto. (matsumoto at soutaro dot com)
Released under the MIT License: www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
github.com/soutaro/unification_assertion