naught_check¶ ↑
Why?¶ ↑
Got tired of string.empty? checks in a project blowing up on nil strings.
On a Rails project where numeric fields are declared NOT NULL, you can use ActiveSupport’s .blank? and Numeric’s .zero? instead.
But .zero? isn’t nil-safe, so if you have possibly-nil numerics you would have to require ‘andand’ and remember to do number.andand.zero? for every zero-check. Or reopen Numeric.zero? in the project and add the nil-check. Or use something like this.
Usage: ¶ ↑
require 'naught_check' include Naught nil.naught? => true "".naught? => true " ".naught? => true [].naught? => true {}.naught? => true 0.naught? => true 0.00.naught? => true
.aught? does the reverse, so you don’t need the double-negative of !value.naught? (value-not-naught sounds silly)
Compared to ActiveSupport .blank?¶ ↑
In a Rails project, ActiveSupport .blank? would do almost the same thing, except for numbers:
0.blank? => false 0.naught? => true
It’s like ActiveSupport .blank? combined with a nil-safe Numeric .zero?
Copyright¶ ↑
Copyright © 2010 Sean Miller. See LICENSE for details.