Project

parspec

0.0
No commit activity in last 3 years
No release in over 3 years
A specification language for Parslet grammars and transformers, which gets translated to RSpec.
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
 Dependencies

Development

~> 1.7
~> 10.0

Runtime

~> 3.0
 Project Readme

Parspec

A gUnit-like specification language for Parslet parsers and transformers, which gets translated to RSpec specs.

Status

This software is feature-complete, since it realizes the features of gUnit (with some additions) completely and can successfully be used as a full gUnit-like replacement of handmade RSpec specs. I won't implement any new features. Feel free to fork and take over maintainership.

Installation

Add this line to your application's Gemfile:

gem 'parspec', group: :test

And then execute:

$ bundle

Or install with gem:

$ gem install parspec

Specification language

Example

The following example shows parts of the TOML spec translated to Parspec:

parser TOML::Parser

value:
    "120381" OK
    "0181" FAIL
    "3.14159" OK
    ".1" FAIL
    "true" OK
    "truefalse" FAIL
    "1979-05-27T07:32:00Z" OK
    "1979l05-27 07:32:00" FAIL
    "\"hello world\"" OK
    "\"hello\nworld\"" FAIL
    "\"hello/world\"" FAIL

    "1234"                 -> ":integer => '1234'"
    "-0.123"               -> ":float   => '-0.123'"
    "true"                 -> ":boolean => 'true'"
    "1979-05-27T07:32:00Z" -> ":datetime => '1979-05-27T07:32:00Z'"
    "\"hello world\""      -> ":string => 'hello world'"
    "\"hello\nworld\""     -> ":string => \"hello\nworld\""

array:
    "[]" OK
    "[1]" OK
    "[0.1, -0.1, 3.14159]" OK
    "[ true, false, true, true ]" OK
    "[1979-05-27T07:32:00Z]" OK  # [2013-02-24T17:26:21Z]
    "[\n1\n,\n2\n]" OK
    "[\n\n\t1  , 2,     3\\t,4\n]" OK
    "[1, 2, \"three\"]" FAIL
    "[1,2,]" OK
    "[1,2\n,\\t]" OK

     "[1,2]"     -> ":array => [ {:integer => '1'}, {:integer => '2'}]"
     "[]"        -> ":array => '[]'"
     "[ [1,2] ]"
        -> ":array => [
              {:array => [ {:integer => '1'}, {:integer => '2'}]}
           ]"

key:
     "foobar" OK
     "lolwhat.noWAY" OK
     "no white\\tspace" FAIL
     "noequal=thing" FAIL

assignment:
      "key=3.14" OK
      "key = 10" OK
      "key = true" OK
      "key = \"value\"" OK
      "#comment=1" FAIL
      "thing = 1" -> ":key => 'thing', :value => {:integer => '1'}"

Description

Header

A Parspec specification starts with a definition of the subject:

<type> <instantiation expression>

There are two types of specifications: parser and transformer. A parser specification describes a Parslet::Parser, a transformer specification describes a Parslet::Transform. Syntactically these types of specifications are equal, but the generated RSpec descriptions will differ.

The instantiation expression is used to create a RSpec test subject. It usually consists of a constant for a Parslet::Parser or Parslet::Transform class, according to the type of specification, but can be any valid Ruby expression, which responds to new with a Parslet::Parser or Parslet::Tranform instance.

Rule examples

After the definition, a series of examples for the grammar rules follows. Rules start with a rule name followed by a colon.

There are two types of examples: validations and mapping examples.

Validations

A validation is a string in double-quotes followed either by the keyword OK or FAIL, according to the expected outcome of parsing the given string under the given rule. Currently, it is supported in parser specifications only.

For example, the following validation:

some_rule:
  "some input" OK
  "another input" FAIL

will translate to this RSpec description:

context 'some_rule parsing' do
  subject { parser.some_rule }

  it { should parse 'some input' }
  it { should_not parse 'another input' }
end
Mapping examples

Mapping examples describe the input-output-behaviour of a rule. Syntactically they consist of two strings separated by ->. Since the semantics of parser and transformer specifications differ, let's discuss them separately, starting with the parser case:

While the input string on the left side is simply some sample text as in a validity example, the output string on the right must contain a valid Ruby expression, which should evaluate to the expected outcome of the respective rule parsing.

For example, the following mapping:

some_rule:
  "some input"    -> "42"
  "another input" -> "{ foo: 'bar' }"

will be translated to the following RSpec parser specification:

context 'some_rule parsing' do
  subject { parser.some_rule }

  it "should parse 'some input' to 42" do
    expect(subject.parse('some input')).to eq 42
  end

  it "should parse 'another input' to { foo: 'bar' }" do
    expect(subject.parse('another input')).to eq { foo: 'bar' }
  end
end

In the case of a transformer specification, both sides must contain Ruby expressions.

Shared examples

The examples of a rule can be reused inside other rules with the include keyword:

some_rule:
  "some input"    -> "42"
  "another input" -> "{ foo: 'bar' }"

another_rule:
  include some_rule

String escaping

Parspec strings in general support the following escape sequences: \t, \n, \r, \", \\.

Comments

One-line comments are supported in the #-style.

Usage

Command-line interface

Parspec comes with a command-line interface through the parspec command.

For a full description of the available parameters, run:

$ parspec --help
Usage: parspec [options] PARSPEC_FILE
    -h, --help                       Display this information
    -v, --version                    Print version information
    -s, --stdout                     Print the translation to stdout only
    -o, --out OUTPUT_FILE            Path where translated RSpec file should be stored
    -b, --beside-input               Put the output file into the same directory as the input
    -e, --header HEADER              A block of code to be put in front of the translation
        --no-debug-parse             Don't print the whole Parslet ascii_tree on errors

Unless specified otherwise, the default header is:

# coding: utf-8
require 'spec_helper'
require 'parslet/convenience'
require 'parslet/rig/rspec'

load_parspec

You can use the command-line interface to integrate Parspec in your testing tool chain, e.g. via Rake or Guard.

But you can also load your Parspec spec from a normal Ruby file in your spec directory with the load_parspec command:

require 'spec_helper'
require 'parspec'
require 'my_parser'

load_parspec __FILE__

If the load_parspec command gets a filename with the extension .rb, it looks for a file with the same name, but the extension .parspec. For example, if the former Ruby file would be at spec/my_parser/my_parser_spec.rb, the load_parspec command would try to load a Parspec spec from a file spec/my_parser/my_parser_spec.parspec.

Note: This feature is currently implemented via eval, till I find a way to include specs from other RSpec files or another alternative. If you have any advice, please share it in issue #1.

Contributing

  1. Fork it ( https://github.com/marcelotto/parspec/fork )
  2. Create your feature branch (git checkout -b my-new-feature)
  3. Commit your changes (git commit -am 'Add some feature')
  4. Push to the branch (git push origin my-new-feature)
  5. Create a new Pull Request

Author

  • Marcel Otto