Property-Based Testing in Ruby
A property-based testing tool for Ruby with experimental features that allow you to run test cases in parallel.
PBT stands for Property-Based Testing.
As for the results of the parallelization experiment, please refer the talk at RubyKaigi 2024: Unlocking Potential of Property Based Testing with Ractor.
What's Property-Based Testing?
Property-Based Testing is a testing methodology that focuses on the properties a system should always satisfy, rather than checking individual examples. Instead of writing tests for predefined inputs and outputs, PBT allows you to specify the general characteristics that your code should adhere to and then automatically generates a wide range of inputs to verify these properties.
The key benefits of property-based testing include the ability to cover more edge cases and the potential to discover bugs that traditional example-based tests might miss. It's particularly useful for identifying unexpected behaviors in your code by testing it against a vast set of inputs, including those you might not have considered.
For a more in-depth understanding of Property-Based Testing, please refer to external resources.
- Original ideas
- Rather new introductory resources
Installation
Add this line to your application's Gemfile and run bundle install
.
gem 'pbt'
Off course you can install with gem intstall pbt
.
Basic Usage
Simple property
# Let's say you have your own sort method.
def sort(array)
return array if array.size <= 2 # Here's a bug! It should be 1.
pivot, *rest = array
left, right = rest.partition { |n| n <= pivot }
sort(left) + [pivot] + sort(right)
end
Pbt.assert do
# The given block is executed 100 times with different arrays with random numbers.
# Besides, if you set `worker: :ractor` option to `assert` method, it runs in parallel using Ractor.
Pbt.property(Pbt.array(Pbt.integer)) do |numbers|
result = sort(numbers)
result.each_cons(2) do |x, y|
raise "Sort algorithm is wrong." unless x <= y
end
end
end
# If the method has a bug, the test fails and it reports a minimum counterexample.
# For example, the sort method doesn't work for [0, -1].
#
# Pbt::PropertyFailure:
# Property failed after 23 test(s)
# seed: 43738985293126714007411539287084402325
# counterexample: [0, -1]
# Shrunk 40 time(s)
# Got RuntimeError: Sort algorithm is wrong.
Explain The Snippet
The above snippet is very simple but contains the basic components.
Runner
Pbt.assert
is the runner. The runner interprets and executes the given property. Pbt.assert
takes a property and runs it multiple times. If the property fails, it tries to shrink the input that caused the failure.
Property
The snippet above declared a property by calling Pbt.property
. The property describes the following:
- What the user wants to evaluate. This corresponds to the block (let's call this
predicate
) enclosed bydo
end
- How to generate inputs for the predicate — using
Arbitrary
The predicate
block is a function that directly asserts, taking values generated by Arbitrary
as input.
Arbitrary
Arbitrary generates random values. It is also responsible for shrinking those values if asked to shrink a failed value as input.
Here, we used only one type of arbitrary, Pbt.integer
. There are many other built-in arbitraries, and you can create a variety of inputs by combining existing ones.
Shrink
In PBT, If a test fails, it attempts to shrink the case that caused the failure into a form that is easier for humans to understand. In other words, instead of stopping the test itself the first time it fails and reporting the failed value, it tries to find the minimal value that causes the error.
When there is a test that fails when given an even number, a counterexample of [0, -1]
is simpler and easier to understand than any complex example like [-897860, -930517, 577817, -16302, 310864, 856411, -304517, 86613, -78231]
.
Arbitrary
There are many built-in arbitraries in Pbt
. You can use them to generate random values for your tests. Here are some representative arbitraries.
Primitives
rng = Random.new
Pbt.integer.generate(rng) # => 42
Pbt.integer(min: -1, max: 8).generate(rng) # => Integer between -1 and 8
Pbt.symbol.generate(rng) # => :atq
Pbt.ascii_char.generate(rng) # => "a"
Pbt.ascii_string.generate(rng) # => "aagjZfao"
Pbt.boolean.generate(rng) # => true or false
Pbt.constant(42).generate(rng) # => 42 always
Composites
rng = Random.new
Pbt.array(Pbt.integer).generate(rng) # => [121, -13141, 9825]
Pbt.array(Pbt.integer, max: 1, empty: true).generate(rng) # => [] or [42] etc.
Pbt.tuple(Pbt.symbol, Pbt.integer).generate(rng) # => [:atq, 42]
Pbt.fixed_hash(x: Pbt.symbol, y: Pbt.integer).generate(rng) # => {x: :atq, y: 42}
Pbt.hash(Pbt.symbol, Pbt.integer).generate(rng) # => {atq: 121, ygab: -1142}
Pbt.one_of(:a, 1, 0.1).generate(rng) # => :a or 1 or 0.1
See ArbitraryMethods module for more details.
What if property-based tests fail?
Once a test fails it's time to debug. Pbt
provides some features to help you debug.
How to reproduce
When a test fails, you'll see a message like below.
Pbt::PropertyFailure:
Property failed after 23 test(s)
seed: 43738985293126714007411539287084402325
counterexample: [0, -1]
Shrunk 40 time(s)
Got RuntimeError: Sort algorithm is wrong.
# and backtraces
You can reproduce the failure by passing the seed to Pbt.assert
.
Pbt.assert(seed: 43738985293126714007411539287084402325) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.array(Pbt.integer)) do |number|
# your test
end
end
Verbose mode
You may want to know which values pass and which values fail. You can enable verbose mode by passing verbose: true
to Pbt.assert
.
Pbt.assert(verbose: true) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.array(Pbt.integer)) do |numbers|
# your failed test
end
end
The verbose mode prints the results of each tested values.
Encountered failures were:
- [-897860, -930517, 577817, -16302, 310864, 856411, -304517, 86613, -78231]
- [310864, 856411, -304517, 86613, -78231]
- [-304517, 86613, -78231]
(snipped for README)
- [0, -3]
- [0, -2]
- [0, -1]
Execution summary:
. × [-897860, -930517, 577817, -16302, 310864, 856411, -304517, 86613, -78231]
. . √ [-897860, -930517, 577817, -16302, 310864]
. . √ [-930517, 577817, -16302, 310864, 856411]
. . √ [577817, -16302, 310864, 856411, -304517]
. . √ [-16302, 310864, 856411, -304517, 86613]
. . × [310864, 856411, -304517, 86613, -78231]
(snipped for README)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ [-2]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ []
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . × [0, -1]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ [0]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ [-1]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ []
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . √ [0, 0]
Configuration
You can configure Pbt
by calling Pbt.configure
before running tests.
Pbt.configure do |config|
# Whether to print verbose output. Default is `false`.
config.verbose = false
# The concurrency method to use. `:ractor`, `:thread`, `:process` and `:none` are supported. Default is `:none`.
config.worker = :none
# The number of runs to perform. Default is `100`.
config.num_runs = 100
# The seed to use for random number generation.
# It's useful to reproduce failed test with the seed you'd pick up from failure messages. Default is a random seed.
config.seed = 42
# Whether to report exceptions in threads.
# It's useful to suppress error logs on Ractor that reports many errors. Default is `false`.
config.thread_report_on_exception = false
# Whether to allow RSpec expectation and matchers in Ractor. It's quite experimental! Default is `false`.
config.experimental_ractor_rspec_integration = false
end
Or, you can pass the configuration to Pbt.assert
as an argument.
Pbt.assert(num_runs: 100, seed: 42) do
# ...
end
Concurrency methods
One of the key features of Pbt
is its ability to rapidly execute test cases in parallel or concurrently, using a large number of values (by default, 100
) generated by Arbitrary
.
For concurrent processing, you can specify any of the three workers—:ractor
, :process
, or :thread
—using the worker
option. Alternatively, choose :none
for serial execution.
Pbt
supports 3 concurrency methods and 1 sequential one. You can choose one of them by setting the worker
option.
Be aware that the performance of each method depends on the test subject. For example, if the test subject is CPU-bound, :ractor
may be the best choice. Otherwise, :none
shall be the best choice for most cases. See benchmarks.
Ractor
:ractor
worker is useful for test cases that are CPU-bound. But it's experimental and has some limitations as described below. If you encounter any issues due to those limitations, consider using :process
as workers whose benchmark is the most similar to :ractor
.
Pbt.assert(worker: :ractor) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
# ...
end
end
Limitation
Please note that Ractor support is an experimental feature of this gem. Due to Ractor's limitations, you may encounter some issues when using it.
For example, you cannot access anything out of block.
a = 1
Pbt.assert(worker: :ractor) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
# You cannot access `a` here because this block is executed in a Ractor and it doesn't allow implicit sharing of objects.
a + n # => Ractor::RemoteError (can not share object between ractors)
end
end
You cannot use any methods provided by test frameworks like expect
or assert
because they are not available in a Ractor.
it do
Pbt.assert(worker: :ractor) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
# This is not possible because `self` if a Ractor here.
expect(n).to be_an(Integer) # => Ractor::RemoteError (cause by NoMethodError for `expect` or `be_an`)
end
end
end
If you're a challenger, you can enable the experimental feature to allow using RSpec expectations and matchers in Ractor. It works but it's quite experimental and could cause unexpected behaviors.
Please note that this feature depends on prism gem. If you use Ruby 3.2 or prior, you need to install the gem by yourself.
it do
Pbt.assert(worker: :ractor, experimental_ractor_rspec_integration: true) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
# Some RSpec expectations and matchers are available in Ractor by hack.
# Other features like `let`, `subject`, `before`, `after` that access out of block are still not available.
expect(n).to be_an(Integer)
end
end
end
Process
If you'd like to run test cases that are CPU-bound and :ractor
is not available, :process
becomes a good choice.
Pbt.assert(worker: :process) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
# ...
end
end
If you want to use :process
, you need to install the parallel gem.
Thread
You may not need to run test cases with multi-threads.
Pbt.assert(worker: :thread) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
# ...
end
end
If you want to use :thread
, you need to install the parallel gem.
None
For most cases, :none
is the best choice. It runs tests sequentially (without parallelism) but most test cases finishes within a reasonable time.
Pbt.assert(worker: :none) do
Pbt.property(Pbt.integer) do |n|
# ...
end
end
TODOs
Once this project finishes the following, we will release v1.0.0.
- Implement basic primitive arbitraries
- Implement composite arbitraries
- Support shrinking
- Support multiple concurrency methods
- Ractor
- Process
- Thread
- None (Run tests sequentially)
- Documentation
- Add better examples
- Arbitrary usage
- Configuration
- Benchmark
- Rich report by verbose mode
- (Partially) Allow to use expectations and matchers provided by test framework in Ractor if possible.
- It'd be so hard to pass assertions like
expect
,assert
to a Ractor.
- It'd be so hard to pass assertions like
- Implement frequency arbitrary
- Statistics feature to aggregate generated values
- Decide DSL
- Try Fiber
- Stateful property-based testing
Development
Setup
bin/setup
bundle exec rake # Run tests and lint at once
Test
bundle exec rspec
Lint
bundle exec rake standard:fix
Contributing
Bug reports and pull requests are welcome on GitHub at https://github.com/ohbarye/pbt. This project is intended to be a safe, welcoming space for collaboration, and contributors are expected to adhere to the code of conduct.
License
The gem is available as open source under the terms of the MIT License.
Credits
This project draws a lot of inspiration from other testing tools, namely
Code of Conduct
Everyone interacting in the Pbt project's codebases, issue trackers, chat rooms and mailing lists is expected to follow the code of conduct.