Are your tests order-dependent? Tired of all those randomly failing specs? Can't be bothered to use Timecop? Just give up and surrender. But at least use a proper syntax.
Introducing the maybe
syntax for RSpec.
Installation
Add this line to your application's Gemfile:
gem 'spec-me-maybe'
And then execute:
$ bundle
Or install it yourself as:
$ gem install spec-me-maybe
Then, in your spec_helper.rb
file:
require 'rspec/maybes'
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.expect_with :rspec do |expectations|
# Enable the `maybe` syntax from spec-me-maybe, e.g.:
# maybe(actual).will eq(expected)
expectations.syntax = :maybe
end
end
Usage
The "maybe" syntax looks and feels almost exactly like the "expect" syntax:
describe User do
describe '#initialize' do
let(:user) { User.new(name: 'David Celis') }
it 'should set up a name' do
maybe(user.name).will eq 'David Celis'
end
it 'probably should not raise any sort of error' do
maybe { user }.will_not raise_error
end
end
end
Whereas expect
would set up an RSpec::Expectations::ExpectationTarget
, maybe
will instead set up an RSpec::Maybe::MaybeTarget
. Like expectations, maybes may or may not fail. In the case of maybes, however, they will fail randomly regardless of your code. But hey, maybe your Expectations were like that too.
If your colleagues' complaints of broken specs are totally bullshit because you're super sure they work on your machine, we've got you covered. Here's the above example again, but this time it'll totally always pass:
describe User do
describe '#initialize' do
let(:user) { User.new(name: 'David Celis') }
it 'should set up a name' do
maybe(user.name).will eq('David Celis').on_my_machine
end
it 'probably should not raise any sort of error' do
maybe { user }.will_not raise_error.on_my_machine
end
end
end
Contributing
- Fork it
- Create your feature branch (
git checkout -b my-new-feature
) - Commit your changes (
git commit -am 'Add some feature'
) - Push to the branch (
git push origin my-new-feature
) - Create a new Pull Request